Bezpieczeństwo. Teoria i Praktyka

Akinrele, O. (2025). Bias mitigation in AI-driven banking: Legal, ethical, and regulatory perspectives. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 17(2), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.17.2.3013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.17.2.3013
Google Scholar

Baesens, B., Roesch, D. Scheule, H. (2016). Credit risk analytics: Measurement techniques, applications, and examples in SAS. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119449560
Google Scholar

Bell, S., Gadanecz, B., Gambacorta, L., Perez-Cruz, F., & Shreeti, V. (2025, 24 kwietnia). Artificial intelligence and human capital: Challenges for central banks, BIS Bulletin, 100. https://www.bis.org/publications/bulletin-100-artificial-intelligence-and-human-capital-challenges-central-banks.pdf
Google Scholar

Bharti, S. S., Prasad, K., Sudha, S., & Kumari, V. (2023). Customer acceptability towards AI-enabled digital banking: A PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 28(4), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-023-00241-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-023-00241-9
Google Scholar

Bowen III, D. E., McKay Price, S., Stein, L. C. D., Yang, K. (2024, 3 czerwca). Measuring and mitigating racial disparities in LLMs: Evidence from a mortgage underwriting experiment. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4812158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4812158
Google Scholar

Calvery, J. (2024, 10 czerwca). Harnessing the power of AI to fight financial crime. HSBC. https://www.hsbc.com/news-and-views/views/hsbc-views/harnessing-the-power-of-ai-to-fight-financial-crime
Google Scholar

Centrum Procesów Bankowych i Informacji. (2024). Era AI: jak sztuczna inteligencja zmienia bankowość? Wydawnictwo Centrum Procesów Bankowych i Informacji. https://bank.pl/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Raport_ERA_AI.pdf
Google Scholar

Citron D. K., Pasquale F. (2014). The scored society: Due process for automated predictions. Washington Law Review, 89(1), 1–34.
Google Scholar

Edwards, L., Veale, M. (2017). Slave to the algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for. Duke Law & Technology Review, 16(1), 18–84. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dltr/vol16/iss1/2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/97upg
Google Scholar

Financial Stability Board (2024, 14 listopada). The financial stability implications of artificial intelligence. https://www.fsb.org/uploads/P14112024.pdf
Google Scholar

Fredrikson, M., Jha, S., Ristenpart, T. (2015, 12–16 października). Model inversion attacks that exploit confidence information and basic countermeasures. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 1322–1333). https://doi.org/10.1145/2810103.2813677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2810103.2813677
Google Scholar

International Organization for Standardization. (2023). Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Management system (ISO/IEC Standard No. 42001:2023). https://www.iso.org/standard/81230.html
Google Scholar

Häuselmann, A. N. (2024, 23 kwietnia). EU privacy and data protection law applied to AI: unveiling the legal problems for individuals [Doctoral thesis, Leiden University]. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/3747996
Google Scholar

Kowalik, Z., Lewandowski, P., Geodecki, T., & Grodzicki, M. (2025). Automation in shared services centres: Implications for skills and autonomy. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 36(2), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/elr.2025.10026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/elr.2025.10026
Google Scholar

Kroll, J. A., Huey, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R., Robinson, D. G., & Yu, H. (2017). Accountable algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(3), 633–705.
Google Scholar

Lee, J. D., See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392
Google Scholar

Mäntymäki, M., Minkkinen, M., Birkstedt, T., Viljanen, M. (2022). Defining organizational AI governance. AI and Ethics, 2, 603–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00143-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00143-x
Google Scholar

McLemore, P., Mihov, A. (2026). AI and operational losses: Evidence from U.S. Bank Holding Companies. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, artykuł cfag003. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfag003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfag003
Google Scholar

Nagarakanti, R. C. (2025). Human-AI collaboration in financial services: Augmenting decision-making with cloud-native intelligence. European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 13(22), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.37745/ejcsit.2013/vol13n222341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37745/ejcsit.2013/vol13n222341
Google Scholar

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). NIST AI 100-1. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
Google Scholar

Naveen, K. R., Janani, M., Pavithra, R. (2026). Assessing the influence of AI adoption and trust on customer satisfaction in digital banking services. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 91(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMAMJ-12-2024-0100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMAMJ-12-2024-0100
Google Scholar

Nimmagadda, V. S. P. (2022). Artificial Intelligence for automated loan underwriting in banking: Advanced models, techniques, and real-world applications. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research and Applications, 2(1). https://aimlstudies.co.uk/index.php/jaira/article/view/204
Google Scholar

Noriega, J. P., Rivera, L. A., Herrera, J. A. (2023). Machine learning for credit risk prediction: A systematic literature review. Data, 8(11), artykuł 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/data8110169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/data8110169
Google Scholar

Pramudito, D., Na’am, J., Ernawan, F. (2025). Exploring blockchain and AI in digital banking: A literature review on transactions enhancement, fraud detection, and financial inclusion. Sistemasi: Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 14(3), 1448–1459. https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v14i3.5231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v14i3.5231
Google Scholar

Rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2024/1689 z dnia 13 czerwca 2024 r. w sprawie ustanowienia zharmonizowanych przepisów dotyczących sztucznej inteligencji oraz zmiany rozporządzeń (WE) nr 300/2008, (UE) nr 167/2013, (UE) nr 168/2013, (UE) 2018/858, (UE) 2018/1139 i (UE) 2019/2144 oraz dyrektyw 2014/90/UE, (UE) 2016/797 i (UE) 2020/1828 (akt w sprawie sztucznej inteligencji). Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej, Dz.U. L 2024/1689. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689
Google Scholar

Sachan, S., Yang, J. B., Xu, D. L., Benavides, D. E., Li, Y. (2020). An explainable AI decision-support-system to automate loan underwriting. Expert Systems with Applications, 144, artykuł 113100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113100
Google Scholar

Schuett, J. (2025). Three lines of defense against risks from AI. AI & Society, 40, 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01811-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01811-0
Google Scholar

Shi, S., Tse, R., Luo, W., D'Addona, S., Pau, G. (2022). Machine learning-driven credit risk: a systemic review. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(17), 14327–14339. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07472-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07472-2
Google Scholar

Szostek, D., Bar, G., Prabucki, T., Nowakowski, M. (2022, sierpień). Zastosowanie sztucznej inteligencji w bankowości – szanse oraz zagrożenia. Analiza prawno regulacyjna wpływu technologii uczenia maszynowego i pokrewnych na obowiązki sektora bankowego z zakresu zapewnienia zgodności (compliance) oraz zarządzania ryzykiem. Raport opracowany na zlecenie Programu Analityczno-Badawczego Fundacji Warszawski Instytut Bankowości.
Google Scholar

Tammenga, A. (2020). The application of Artificial Intelligence in banks in the context of the three lines of defence model. Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, 94(5/6), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.94.47158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.94.47158
Google Scholar

The Institute of Internal Auditors. (2013). The Three Lines Of Defense In Effective Risk Management And Control [Position paper]. https://theiia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/pp-the-three-lines-of-defense-in-effective-risk-management-and-control.pdf
Google Scholar

The Institute of Internal Auditors. (2020). The IIA’s Three Lines Model: An update of the Three Lines of Defense [Position paper]. https://www.theiia.org/globalassets/documents/resources/the-iias-three-lines-model-an-update-of-the-three-lines-of-defense-july-2020/three-lines-model-updated-english.pdf
Google Scholar

Tshewang S. (2024, 6 kwietnia), Impact of artificial intelligence on job market in the banking sector: A focus on the Indian context. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4786492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4786492
Google Scholar

Uddin, N. (2025). Role of AI in preventing financial crime: A comprehensive analytical review. Journal of Economic Criminology, 13, artykuł 100200. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100200
Google Scholar

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. http://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Google Scholar

Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Floridi, L. (2017). Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the General Data Protection Regulation. International Data Privacy Law, 7(2), 76–99. http://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipx005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipx005
Google Scholar

World Economic Forum. (2025a) Future of Jobs Report 2025. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/
Google Scholar

Ziółkowska, E. (2023), Wpływ sztucznej inteligencji na rynek finansowy w procesie podejmowania decyzji ekonomicznych – szanse, wyzwania i rekomendacje, Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, 192, 89–108. https://doi.org/10.33119/SIP.2023.192.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33119/SIP.2023.192.5
Google Scholar