European Polygraph

Ethical Oversight ↑

The editorial staff and publisher of European Polygraph has adopted and adheres to ethical principles consistent with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and Elsevier. Any cases of unethical conduct (including guest authorship, ghostwriting, data manipulation, plagiarism, text recycling, duplicate or simultaneous publication in different publishing houses) will be considered in accordance with the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). In cases which have not been described on these website, the Editorial Team abides by COPE guidelines and follows COPE Flowcharts.

Rules for Authors ↑

1. Authors are required to familiarize themselves with the journal's publishing ethics, the procedure for qualifying materials for publication, article requirements, and technical guidelines;
2. may submit only their own original texts for publication. All borrowings (e.g., cited opinions, quotations, data in tables) in the text must be appropriately referenced;
3. are required to provide a reliable description of the research work performed and an objective interpretation of the results;
4. are required to include a list of all publications used in the preparation of the material (reference list), and to provide references to the relevant pages (exact page numbers) of the cited materials in the main text.
5. The author undertakes to actively participate in the work on the article at the publication preparation phase (response to reviews, copyediting, etc.).
6. If serious errors or inaccuracies are discovered in the submitted text, the author should immediately notify the publisher so that these errors can be corrected during the editorial process.
7. If questions, disputes, or allegations of scientific misconduct arise in a published article, the author is obligated to respond to the discussion.
8. Any instances of unethical conduct (including guest authorship, ghostwriting, data manipulation, plagiarism, text recycling, duplicate or simultaneous publications in different publishing houses) will be considered in accordance with the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
9. No fees (APCs, Article Processing Charges) are charged for the editorial work and publication of the article.
10. Authors do not receive remuneration for the publication of the article.

Rules for Readers ↑

1. The journal is published in Open Access. Content is available free of charge to individual readers and institutions.
2. Access to content does not require logging in.
3. All texts from the journal are published under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International (Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivative Works) electronic license, which means that works may be copied and distributed in any medium and format, provided:
   • the author's name and surname are credited;
   • the content is not used for financial gain or monetary compensation;
   • modified content is not distributed (e.g., adaptations, remixes).
4. The Editors invite Readers to discuss the published content. The Editors may publish the content of such debates or polemical articles in the journal.
5. The Editorial Office encourages Readers to report any detected instances of scientific misconduct, particularly ghostwriting, guest authorship, plagiarism, data falsification, data manipulation, incorrect or negligent research procedures, or violations of ethical principles in science. Such reports will be reviewed and considered by the Editor-in-Chief, who:
   • reviews the evidence of scientific misconduct;
   • contacts the Author and requests an explanation;
   • decides to withdraw the article, publish a correction/correction, or inform the appropriate authorities or institutions;
   • The Editor-in-Chief may decide to consult the case with the Journal's Editorial Board and the Editorial Board of Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University;
   • The Editorial Office is obligated to record and archive such cases.

Comments on articles and any concerns regarding scientific misconduct should be addressed to the  Editor at mwidacki@uafm.edu.pl

Rules for Editors ↑

1. The Editorial Team ensures the quality, regularity of publication, and accessibility of the Journal. It is guided by scientific integrity and impartiality and strives to raise scientific, editorial, and ethical standards.
2. ensures compliance with publishing ethics and counteracts plagiarism, abuse, and other unfair practices, such as ghostwriting and guest authorship;
3. evaluates submitted materials according to an established and transparent procedure and decides which texts will be published, based on the opinions of external reviewers appointed for this purpose;
4. considers the originality of submitted material, its scientific value, and its importance for the development of research in Poland and globally;
5. commercial considerations do not influence the Editorial Team's decisions;
6. treats received materials as confidential and does not disclose information about submitted articles to unauthorized persons;
7. does not use unpublished articles without the written consent of the authors;
8. has the right to withdraw a publication after its publication if evidence emerges indicating unreliability or falsification of the research, methodological errors, plagiarism, or other violations of publishing ethics;
9. prevents conflicts of interest.

Rules for Reviewers ↑

1. The reviewer is obligated to objectively evaluate the submitted article;
2. is obligated to refuse to review if a conflict of interest or lack of competence in the article's subject matter is suspected;
3. should report any significant similarities between the reviewed text and other works known to them;
4. should indicate significant works related to the subject of the reviewed text not cited by the author;
5. may not use the reviewed work for their own personal needs or benefit;
6. is obligated to submit the review using the form within the specified deadline.
7. The review concludes with a clear statement regarding the rejection of the text, publication of the text without corrections, or the need for the indicated corrections.
8. Reviewed works are confidential and disclosure to unauthorized persons is prohibited.
9. The content of the review is not publicly disclosed.
10. The reviewer does not suggest adding links to their own works to the reviewed article.
11. The author receives the reviews in an anonymous form. Direct interaction between the author and the reviewer is prohibited.
12. The reviewer does not use generative AI tools in the review process.

Authorship and Contributorship ↑

All persons listed as authors in the header of the submitted article must have made a real and significant contribution to the creation of the text (design, concept, planning, execution, interpretation of results).

A co-author of an article is anyone who wrote even a small part of it, made a creative contribution to its conception or layout, or participated in the design of the research. A person who performed administrative duties (e.g., the head of a research institution, a person obtaining research funds, a person collecting data or performing statistical calculations) is not considered a co-author. A consultant sharing their expertise also does not acquire the right to co-authorship.

The obligation to provide the names of all co-authors rests with the author submitting the article for publication (the corresponding author). The Editorial Office of the journal European Polygraph does not require a percentage of a co-author's contribution.

The names of co-authors should be listed in order of their contribution to the article (starting with the greatest contribution) or (in the case of equal contribution) in alphabetical order. After review and a decision to accept the article, changing the order of co-authors' names in the header, adding or removing a co-author is only possible if irregularities are detected, in accordance with the procedures recommended by COPE.

The editorial office corresponds (e.g., regarding corrections) only with the author designated as the corresponding author. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all co-authors approve the final form of the article after review and editing.

Other individuals who had an identifiable influence (not meeting the criteria for co-authorship) on the final form of the work (e.g., general mentoring) should be listed in the "Acknowledgements" section at the end of the article.

Only human can be an author and co-author of the article.

All co-authors of articles submit their own signed statement.

The author of the article undertakes to respond to reviews and editorial corrections within the deadline set by the Editorial Office and declares that, upon request, they will respond to any discussion or controversy.

Text Recycling/ Self-plagiarism ↑

Text recycling, also known as self-plagiarism, is when sections of the same text appear in more than one of an author’s own publications (overlap of text with an author’s own previously published work).

The editors of European Polygraph will consider each case of text recycling on an individual basis, both in a submitted manuscript and a published article. The decision will depend on the degree and nature of the overlap.

For example, it may be appropriate to have overlap in a methods section of a research article (i.e. referring to a previously used method, with citation of the original article). However, undisclosed overlap, or overlap in the results, discussion, or conclusions is unacceptable. Where overlap is considered to be minor, authors may be asked to re-write overlapping sections, and cite their previous article(s). More significant overlap may result in rejection of the manuscript.

If text recycling is discovered in a published article, it may be necessary to:

• publish a correction (when the original publication is not referenced in the subsequent publication; but there is still sufficient new material in the article to justify its publication) or
• withdraw the article (when the recycled text reports previously published data and there is insufficient new material in the article to justify its publication).

Conflict of Interest Policy ↑

Complaints and Appeals ↑

Complaints and appeals can be submitted to the Editor at mwidacki@uafm.edu.pl

In the event of complaints, grievances, or appeals, particularly those concerning a breach of the principle of impartiality, the Editorial Office:

• is obligated to register and archive them;
• requests a detailed description of the matter;
• is obligated to maintain the anonymity of the submitter unless they expressly consent to their identity being disclosed;
• is obligated to respond in writing within 30 days of receipt;
• will include in its response, at a minimum, an assessment of the matter and a description of the actions taken or planned by the Editorial Office in relation to the matter.

Intellectual Property ↑

The Author submitting a text for publication declares in the statement that the article:

• is the result of the Author's independent, original creative work,
• has been prepared with respect for all third-party rights and does not infringe any rights, including property and personal copyrights, as well as the personal rights of these persons.

If the article contains, in addition to the text, other works not created by the Author incorporated as additional material (e.g., photographs, illustrations, drawings), previously unpublished and not made available in any way, and whose publication requires consent for their use from the persons holding the rights to them, the Author additionally declares that they have obtained all necessary written consents for their publication, including for their reproduction and distribution in the article in question.

Authors are obliged to always indicate other publications and sources that they used in the creation of the article. When citing data or words of others, they should use appropriate citation markings (quotation marks and an appropriate cross-reference).

AI Policy ↑

Generative artificial intelligence tools may not be used to create articles submitted to EP in whole or in part. Articles submitted to EP must be the result of the author’s independent work, and the author bears full responsibility for their content, originality, and the reliability of the sources used. An AI tool cannot be considered the author or co-author of the article.

EP permits the use of assistive AI tools, in particular for language editing, proofreading, structuring text, working translations, data analysis, or technical support, provided that the final content of the article remains the result of the author’s own work.

If the use of generative AI tools forms part of the research project, research methodology, or subject of analysis described in the article, the author should indicate this in the publication and describe the function and scope of the tools used.

Confidentiality ↑

• The submitted article is treated as a confidential document.
• Editors and reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the review process.

Anti-plagiarism Checking ↑

Manuscripts submitted to European Polygraph are routinely screened for plagiarism and text similarity before publication. The journal uses iThenticate / Crossref Similarity Check plagiarism detection software and editorial checks to identify unattributed copying, redundant publication, self-plagiarism, and other forms of text overlap. There are no fixed percentage thresholds for plagiarism. Each similarity report is individually analysed and assessed by the Editors. Submissions that raise concerns may be rejected or returned to the authors for explanation or correction. Any borrowing from another publication must be accompanied by an appropriate reference.

Post-publication Discussions and Corrections. Article Retraction ↑

The Editors of European Polygraph will consider retracting a publication if:

• they have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of major error (e.g. miscalculation), or as a result of fabrication (e.g. of data) or falsification (e.g. image manipulation);
• it constitutes plagiarism that was not detected in the anti-plagiarism check before publication;
• the findings have previously been published elsewhere and lack proper attribution to previous sources or permission to republish;
• it is a case of redundant publication (undisclosed or excessive overlap of text with an author’s own previously published work;
• it contains copyrighted material or data used without authorisation for use;
• copyright has been infringed or there is some other serious legal issue (e.g., libel, privacy, personal data);
• it reports unethical research;
• was created with using generative artificial intelligence tools, in particular for generating the entire text or parts of the text, generating and modifying images, generating false or misleading citations or sources;
• the Author(s) failed to disclose a major conflict of interest that, in the view of the editors, would have unduly affected interpretations of the work or recommendations by editors and peer reviewers.

Each such case will be considered individually and thoroughly. The final decision to withdraw an article rests with the Editor-in-Chief.