European Polygraph

Arendt, H. (1971). Lying in Politics: Reflections on The Pentagon Papers. The New York Review of Books, November 8, p. 2.
Google Scholar

Bojakowski, Jakub (2024). Posłowie KO zaprosili Nawrockiego do Sejmu. Przynieśli wykrywacz kłamstw. Wprost, 28 maja, wydanie online: https://www.wprost.pl/kraj/12028111/poslowie-ko-chca-badac-nawrockiego-wykrywaczem-klamstw-jestesmy-do-dyspozycji.html.
Google Scholar

Bornand, T., & Klein, O. (2022). Political Trust by Individuals of low Socioeconomic Status: The Key Role of Anomie. Social Psychological Bulletin, 17, Article e6897, https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.6897.
Google Scholar

Budaházi, Á. (2012). Conditions and Requirements of Polygraph Examination. European Polygraph, 6(3 (21)), 161–180.
Google Scholar

Cempura, A., Kasolik, A., Widacki, J. (2014). Obecny stan prawny oraz praktyka wykorzystania poligrafu w Polsce [s. 81–100] W: red. J. Widacki, Badania poligraficzne w Polsce. Kraków: Krakowskie Towarzystwo Edukacyjne sp. z o.o. – Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM.
Google Scholar

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, 163, 163–228.
Google Scholar

C
Google Scholar

osmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007, September). Dissecting the computational architecture of social inference mechanisms. In Ciba Foundation Symposium 208‐Characterizing Human Psychological Adaptations: Characterizing Human Psychological Adaptations: Ciba Foundation Symposium 208 (pp. 132–161). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Google Scholar

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2008). Can a general deontic logic capture the facts of human moral reasoning? How the mind interprets social exchange rules and detects cheaters. Moral psychology, 1, 53–119.
Google Scholar

Curtis, D. A., & Hart, C. L. (2022). Pathological lying: Psychotherapists’ experiences and ability to diagnose. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 75(2), 61–66.
Google Scholar

Dallek, R. (2010). Presidential fitness and presidential lies: The historical record and a proposal for reform. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 40(1), 9–22.
Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. (2010). How many friends does one person need? Dunbar’s number and other evolutionary quirks. Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

DePaulo, B. M. (2004). The many faces of lies. The social psychology of good and evil, 303–326.
Google Scholar

Florek, S. (2024). Psychopatic Rules from an Evolutionary Perspective. Eruditio et Ars, (9)2, 94–103.
Google Scholar

Florek, S., Gulla, B. i Piotrowski, P. (2019). Radykalizacja: konteksty psychologiczne. [Radicalization: psychological contexts]. Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Biblioteka Jagiellońska
Google Scholar

Gavrilets, S., & Vose, A. (2006). The dynamics of Machiavellian intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(45), 16823–16828.
Google Scholar

Grubin, D., & Madsen, L. (2005). Lie detection and the polygraph: A historical review. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 16(2), 357–369.
Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4.
Google Scholar

Honts, C. R., & Perry, M. V. (1992). Polygraph admissibility: Changes and challenges. Law and human behavior, 16(3), 357–379.
Google Scholar

Ingersoll, C. (2023). Setting a Standard: Using Psychiatric Fitness-for-Duty Examinations to Determine Whether a President Is Fit to Serve. Quinnipiac Health LJ, 26, 159.
Google Scholar

Kleinmuntz, B., & Szucko, J. J. (1984). Lie detection in ancient and modern times: A call for contemporary scientific study. American Psychologist, 39(7), 766–776, https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.7.766.
Google Scholar

Lee-Chai, A.Y., & Bargh, J.A. (Eds.)(2001). The Use and Abuse of Power. Multiple Perspectives on the Causes of Corruption. Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar

Meijer, E. H., & van Koppen, P. J. (2017). Lie detectors and the law: The use of the polygraph in Europe. In Psychology and law (pp. 45–64). Routledge.
Google Scholar

Miller, G. (2001). The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. New York: Anchor Books.
Google Scholar

Neerdaels, J., Teymoori, A., Tröster, C., & Van Quaquebeke, N. (2024). When lack of control leads to uncertainty: Explaining the effect of anomie on support for authoritarianism.
Google Scholar

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000483.
Google Scholar

Nikolovski, M., Pivovarov, V., & Ivanov, K. (2024). Application of the polygraph in the function of prevention and protection of organized crime and corruption. Security Horizons, 210–221, https://doi.org/10.20544/ICP.9.1.24.P19
Google Scholar

Opancina, V., Sebek, V., & Janjic, V. (2024). Advanced neuroimaging and criminal interrogation in lie detection. Open Medicine,19(1), 20241032, https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-1032.
Google Scholar

Owen, D. (2008). In Sickness and in Power: Illnesses in Heads of Government During the Last 100 Years. Bloomsbury Academic.
Google Scholar

Owen, D., & Davidson, J. (2009). Hubris syndrome: An acquired personality disorder? A study of US presidents and UK prime ministers over the last 100 years. Brain, 132(Pt 5), 1396–1406, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp008.
Google Scholar

Rad, D., Paraschiv, N., & Kiss, C. (2023). Neural network applications in polygraph scoring—A scoping review. Information, 14(10), 564.
Google Scholar

Rutbeck-Goldman, A. (2017). An unfair and cruel weapon: Consequences of modern- day polygraph use in Federal pre-Employment Screening. UC Irvine L. Rev., 7, 715.
Google Scholar

Saxe, L., Dougherty, D., & Cross, T. (1985). The validity of polygraph testing: Scientific analysis and public controversy. American Psychologist, 40(3), 355.
Google Scholar

Selten J.-P. (2023). Consider the hubris syndrome for inclusion in our classification systems. Psychological Medicine, 53(13), 5889–5891, https://doi:10.1017/S0033291723002672.
Google Scholar

Solzhenitzyn, A. (1980). The oak and the calf: sketches of literary life in the Soviet Union. New York: Harper & Row. Synnott, J., Dietzel, D., & Ioannou, M. (2015). A review of the polygraph: history, methodology and current status. Crime Psychology Review, 1(1), 59–83, https://doi.org/10.1080/23744006.2015.1060080.
Google Scholar

The Lancet (2024). Fitness to lead: the health of US presidents, vol. 403, March 16, p. 997.
Google Scholar

White, R. D. (2001). Ask Me No Questions, Tell Me No Lies: Examining the Uses and Misuses of the Polygraph. Public Personnel Management, 30(4), 483–493, https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600103000405.
Google Scholar

Wojciszke, B. (2011). Psychologia władzy. Nauka, 2, 51–69.
Google Scholar